Legal Opinion
Ohio v. Kentucky
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 17, 1980No. 27 ORIGPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
The State of Ohio, in 1966, instituted this action, under the Court’s original jurisdiction, against the Commonwealth of Kentucky. By its bill of complaint as initially filed, Ohio asked that the Court declare and establish that the boundary line between the two States is “the low water mark on the *336northerly side of the Ohio River in the year 1792.” Leave to file the bill of complaint was granted. 384 U. S. 982 (1966). In due course, Kentucky filed its answer and a Special Master was appointed. 385 U. S. 803 (1966). In its answer, Kentucky alleged that the boundary fine is the current…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wilson v. Omaha Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Iowa v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Illinois v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Severance v. PattersonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Benham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- City of Cincinnati v. DrydenHamilton County Municipal Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.