Legal Opinion

Martin v. Pope

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 4, 1956No. 5-966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Appellees, Carl Pope and wife and Bradley Lumber Company, instituted this suit to quiet title to two adjacent 20-acre tracts of land. Appellants, Lummie Martin arid Obilee Thomas, intervened in the suit which culminated in-a decree -quieting appellees’ title and dismissing the intervention of appellants on the ground that they, had disposed of and. no longer claimed any interest in the lands in controversy and had. so testified at the trial.

At the outset, we are confronted with appellees ’ mo-' tion to dismiss the appeal supported by the affidavit of both appellants, which states:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. WebberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BlaylockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Kirtley & GulleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Purvis v. WallsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Davies v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes, & Lerach, LLP v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Jarboe v. HicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Monsanto Chemical Co. v. GrandbushDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
  4. Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes, & Lerach, LLP v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API