Legal Opinion

People v. American Wool Stock Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The business of junk dealers in the city of New York is made the subject of regulation by the Administrative Code [L. 1937, ch. 929], ch. 32, title B, article 18, of which section B32-114.0 provides (p. 1110): “ It shall be unlawful for any person to act as a junk dealer without a license therefor.” The Code also defines a “ junk dealer ” as “Any person engaged in the business of purchasing or selling junk, old rope, old iron, brass, copper, tin, lead, rubber, paper, rags, bagging, slush or empty bottles.” A “ junk shop ” is “ The place of business of a junk dealer.” (§ B32-113.0 ¡p. 1110].)

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Rosenthal v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. People v. . RingeNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. People v. . RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bologno v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Town of Vestal v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. People v. NiermanNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1947
  5. People v. SobelNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API