Ethridge v. Jackson
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
DEADY, District Judge.
At common law costs were not given to either party. By 6 Edw. I. c. 1, commonly called the “Statute of Gloucester,” costs were given in all cases to the party recovering damages, de incremento, as an increase, or increment of the judgment.
The act of February 26, 1853 (10 Stat. 168), provides what attorney’s fees and items of expense are taxable as costs in the national courts. Dedekam v. Voge [Case No. 3,731]; Parker v. Bigler [Id. 10,726]; Lyell v. Miller [Id. 8,620); The Baltimore, 8 Wall. [75 U. S.] 388.
The statute of Gloucester is considered a part of the law which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Costs in Civil CasesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1852
- Pollock v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Jackson v. RandallNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Burnet v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shreve v. CheesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Scatcherd v. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- United States v. TreadwellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883
- Jerman v. StewartUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.