Bacon v. State
Texas Supreme Court
r-p as. Í2§ «IfSgdS ° § §“>3 P o P aE Ci, ^ EL o4 ^ O H o O p h «■ H) s-7 vs ti p&p & © ' a s S st o ” ^ C m p 2 5C3 -í min^ p ^ g §- ® 3 “ *<¡ “ 8 S-OP o ~ 2. ISSgg**.., ■T.O rs o °'S ass? Ol t5 2 2 H 9 O k . o t" .7 S 01 O H o.o fc Hlfcp £ ' £ -P .*£ r-< £5 «M c - V» ; O * o' ■g"c- £;•£: N: __, <1.2 © o-g'S+i g ct: £ p ^ q ,;£,É i *p £ 1 p £-3 c3 O'O •
1Opinion of the Court
Hemphill, Ch. 3.
The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case for *50want oí a recognizance must be sustained. The law requires recognizance to be given in appeals in all criminal cases not capital; and no exceptions can be allowed, unless a constitutional right would otherwise be violated, or unless tho case was one clearly not within the contemplation or scoiDe of tho law. It is doubtful whether cases of this character, where no line, corporal punishment, or imprisonment is to be inflicted, are within the purview of the act; but this is not so clear as to authorize an exception, which as a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Whitcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
- Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Whitcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916