Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Advantage Personnel & Louisiana Safety Ass'n of Timbermen v. Cleave

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 2014No. 2013 CA 1618Published

1ConcurrenceWhipple, C.J.

|,The crucial issue in determining whether Van Cleave was obligated under LSA-R.S. 23:1102(B) to give notice (and obtain written approval) of his settlement is whether the workers’ compensation insurer would have had a cause of action for reimbursement of benefits paid under LSA-R.S. 22:1101. Hanover Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 554 So.2d 1261, 1266 (La.App. 1st Cir.1989). Accordingly, the critical fact herein is simply whether the settlement was tendered pursuant to the UM provisions of the policy or the general liability provisions of the policy. If tendered pursuant to the UM-provisions,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Travelers Ins. Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Faught v. RYDER/P I E NATIONWIDE, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Hanover Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Johnson v. Star EnterprisesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Bennett v. Arkansas Blue Cross Blue ShieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API