People v. Lujan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1502Opinion
HOFFSTADT, J.*
In Maryland v. Craig (1990) 497 U.S. 836 [111 L.Ed.2d 666, 110 S.Ct. 3157] (Craig), the United States Supreme Court held that a child abuse victim could testify by closed-circuit television under certain circumstances without violating the criminal defendant’s right to confront witnesses. In the published portion of our decision, we hold that the same rule applies to a child witness who is not a victim. We also hold that California courts have the inherent authority to order remote testimony in these circumstances.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
I. Offense Conduct
A. Lena
In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. ArredondoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Leif Carlson, Sr. v. Attorney General of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Marshall v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. ZondorakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re Webb, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.