Legal Opinion

People v. Lujan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 2012No. B231123PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1502Opinion

HOFFSTADT, J.*

In Maryland v. Craig (1990) 497 U.S. 836 [111 L.Ed.2d 666, 110 S.Ct. 3157] (Craig), the United States Supreme Court held that a child abuse victim could testify by closed-circuit television under certain circumstances without violating the criminal defendant’s right to confront witnesses. In the published portion of our decision, we hold that the same rule applies to a child witness who is not a victim. We also hold that California courts have the inherent authority to order remote testimony in these circumstances.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

I. Offense Conduct

A. Lena

In…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. ArredondoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Leif Carlson, Sr. v. Attorney General of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Marshall v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. ZondorakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. In re Webb, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API