Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bell v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 2014No. CV-13-623Published

1DissentJosephine Linker Hart, Justice

The majority has clearly erred in holding that Arkansas Code Annotated section 28 — 9—209(d) (Repl.2012), bars Carmella Bell from inheriting from the Estate of Carl McDonald. By its plain wording, section 28 — 9—209(d) applies only to “illegitimate” children. As the majority notes, Ms. Bell was born while her mother, Regina Wingard, was married to Paul McDonald. Arkansas Code Annotated section 28-9-209(a)(2) states: “(2) A child born or conceived during a marriage is presumed to be the legitimate child of both spouses for the same purposes.” Accordingly, Ms. Bell was not an illegitimate child.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burns v. Estate of ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API