Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mesa Petroleum Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 1979No. 16222PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLINGEMAN, Justice.

This is a trespass to try title suit. Appellant, Arthur Mitchell, Trustee (plaintiff below), contends that he has a superior legal title to the oil and gas leasehold estate under Tract “A” of the La Moca Ranch field, and Appellee, Mesa Petroleum Company (defendant below), contends that it has legal title to such oil and gas. The court after a non-jury trial entered judgment that Mitchell take nothing by his suit. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were requested of or filed by the trial court. Appellant will normally hereinafter be referred to as “Mitchell”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Seaman v. SeamanTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Bishop v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Land v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garza v. Maddux, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  2. Karell v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Chesapeake Exploration Limited Partnership, Hallwood Energy III, LP, and Chesapeake Sigma, LP v. Corine Incorporated and Drewland Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  4. Headington Royalty, Inc. and Headington Energy Partners, LLC v. Finley Resources, Inc., Finley Production Co. L.P. and Petro Canyon Energy, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
  5. Rafael D. Alvarado, Et Ux. v. R. A. Alvarado, Alfonso Ibanez and Gloria Ibanez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API