Legal Opinion

W. R. Mumford Co. v. Terry

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1909No. 7,063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Fulton Circuit Court; Harry Bernetha, Judge. Action by the W. R. Mumford Company against Charles C. Terry, as administrator of the estate of Percy E. Terry, deceased. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff ap-. peals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

As disclosed by the record and appellant’s Brief, this case grew out of a claim filed by the appellant against the estate of Percy E. Terry, of which Charles C. Terry was and is administrator. The claim was entered on *340the claim and allowance docket, and disallowed by the administrator, and was then certified to the trial docket by the clerk of the court. Trial was had and judgment rendered against the appellant.

The record discloses that the plaintiff prayed an appeal to this court, and was given 120 days within which to file a bill of exceptions, and thirty days within which to file a bond.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lindley v. DarnallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilt v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API