Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Sussex Cnty. Educ. Servs. Comm'n

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 13, 2018No. DOCKET NO. A–1003–16T4PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FASCIALE, J.A.D.

*953*468In this appeal from a final agency decision by the Commissioner of Education (the Commissioner), we address three legal questions related to the rights that Beryl Zimmerman and Judy Comment (collectively petitioners) enjoy pursuant to the New Jersey Tenure Act (the Tenure Act), N.J.S.A. 18A:28-1 to -18. Petitioners worked as part-time tenured teachers for the Sussex County Educational Services Commission (SCESC). Petitioners provided remedial instruction to eligible students in non-public schools.

The parties resorted to litigation after the SCESC reduced petitioners'…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. G.S. v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Cherry Hill Manor Associates v. FaugnoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. Spiewak v. Rutherford Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. Robert A. Verry v. Franklin Fire District No. 1 (Somerset) (077495) (Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beryl Zimmerman and Judy Comment v. Sussex County Educational Service Commission (080861)(Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API