Legal Opinion

Palm Beach County v. Town of Jupiter

Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

Decided June 3, 1991No. Case No. AP 90-1789 AY (Consolidated)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The Town of Jupiter enacted Ordinance Nos. 59-89, 60-89, and 61-89 annexing certain lands of unincorporated Palm Beach County. *65Petitioners contend Jupiter failed to meet the requirements for annexation set forth in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, as to compactness and contiguity.

The annexation here is a classic example of point-to-point or comer-to-comer abutment. “Contiguous,” when used in the context of municipal annexation has been defined as “touching or adjoining in a reasonably substantial sense.” See City of Sanford v Seminole County, 538 So.2d 113, 115 (Fla. 5th DCA…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Sanford v. Seminole CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. May v. Lee CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API