Maynard v. Thrasher
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
The sole question for determination is whether there exists an appropriation from which the refund sought can be paid. The defendants contend that since the General Assem bly did not specifically appropriate moneys from- which- the refunds provided for under the act of'-1947 (Ga. L. 1947, p. 1115) were to be paid, there is a constitutional prohibition upon .the Auditor’s issuance of the warrant under the provisions' of the Constitution that “No money shall be drawn from the treasury except by appropriation made at law.” Code (Ann. Supp.), § 2-1911. The petitioner contends that the refund…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Maynard v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
3Cited by10 opinions
- Holt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Furman University v. LivingstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- DeKalb County v. J & a Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- State v. Thoni Oil Magic Benzol Gas Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Byington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.