Legal Opinion

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 9, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-3552Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. No. 24-cv-3552-RBW-MAU JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 108.18.47.107, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC’s (“Strike 3”) Motion for Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference (“Motion”). ECF No. 4. For the reasons set forth below, Strike 3’s Motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND Strike 3 has sued Defendant John Doe (“Doe”) for copyright infringement in violation of the Copyright Act,

17 U.S.C. §§ 101

et seq. ECF No. 1 ¶¶…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  4. AF Holdings, LLC v. Does 1-1058Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  5. Saad Aljabri v. Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz al SaudCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API