Legal Opinion

Bullock v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1972No. State 21PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

It appears the alleged offense arises out of a dispute over the amount of money one Edward Laufenberg was to pay the defendant to “turn a trick.”

Initially, we would emphasize that, absent compelling circumstances in criminal cases tried before a jury, alleged errors not presented to the trial court on motions after verdict are not entitled to review by this court as a matter of right. Finger v. State (1968), 40 Wis. 2d 103, 161 N. W. 2d 272; Schwamb v. State (1970), 46 Wis. 2d 1, 173 N. W. 2d 666; State v. Charette (1971), 51 Wis. 2d 531, 187 N. W. 2d 203. In the instant case, the record…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gelhaar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ramer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. EscobedoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Flowers v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sanford v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Irby v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Baldwin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Holmes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. R.W. Hernan Plumbing Corp. v. Anchor Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API