Bullock v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
It appears the alleged offense arises out of a dispute over the amount of money one Edward Laufenberg was to pay the defendant to “turn a trick.”
Initially, we would emphasize that, absent compelling circumstances in criminal cases tried before a jury, alleged errors not presented to the trial court on motions after verdict are not entitled to review by this court as a matter of right. Finger v. State (1968), 40 Wis. 2d 103, 161 N. W. 2d 272; Schwamb v. State (1970), 46 Wis. 2d 1, 173 N. W. 2d 666; State v. Charette (1971), 51 Wis. 2d 531, 187 N. W. 2d 203. In the instant case, the record…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gelhaar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Ramer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. EscobedoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Flowers v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sanford v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Irby v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Baldwin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Holmes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- R.W. Hernan Plumbing Corp. v. Anchor Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.