Legal Opinion

RBS Citizens, N.A. f/k/a Citizens Bank of Rhode Island v. Ouhrabka

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 5, 2011No. 2010-415PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Reiber, CJ.

¶ 1. This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant RBS’s motion for a writ of attachment of appellee Jan Ouhrabka’s property, which Ouhrabka owns jointly with his wife as tenants by entirety. The trial court held that a creditor, like RBS, cannot attach property owned jointly by a debtor and a nondebtor when they hold that property as tenants by entirety. RBS contends that the estate of tenancy by entirety is an anachronism whose continuing utility should be reconsidered. In the alternative, RBS argues that Vermont law does not explicitly preclude…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Beal Bank, SSB v. Almand and AssociatesSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  4. Lang v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Keen v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maniery v. DemlVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API