Legal Opinion

William E. Hagan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 28, 1966No. 19623_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Chief Judge:

The principal claim in this appeal from conviction under the federal narcotics laws is that the District Court erred in refusing to suppress narcotics found on appellant’s person at the time of his arrest.

On September 17, 1964, the police applied to the United States Commissioner for a warrant authorizing a search of appellant’s apartment. The affidavit in support of this application recited that two informants, who had previously been found reliable, had told the police that appellant was selling narcotics from his apartment. The affidavit also described in great detail…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles J. ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. State v. RoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. State v. RoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API