Legal Opinion
Midlarsky v. D'Urso
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 5, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balletta, J.), dated November 21, 1986, as permitted the defendant Arthur D’Urso to purge himself of contempt by granting to the plaintiff a security interest in certain real property, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, dated February 18, 1987, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated November 21, 1986, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated February 18, 1987,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re HildrethAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Busch v. BergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Nestler v. NestlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Odimgbe v. DockeryCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
- Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Park Properties Development AssociatesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
- In re Andrew B.New York City Family Court · 2016
- In re MorounMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012