Legal Opinion
Walter Prochorenko and Oksana Prochorenko v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 23, 2001No. 00-5045Published
1Opinion of the Court
243 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
WALTER PROCHORENKO AND OKSANA PROCHORENKO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 00-5045
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
March 23, 2001
Dennis N. Brager, Law Offices of Dennis N. Brager, A.P.C., of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.
Teresa E. McLaughlin, Attorney, Tax Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, Dc, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was Teresa T. Milton, Attorney.
Before Lourie, Schall, and Bryson, Circuit Judges.
Lourie, Circuit Judge
Judge Nancy B. Firestone
1
Op…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- American Airlines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Abel Kaplan and Mary Lou Kaplan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Lloyd A. Good, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Bankers Trust New York Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.