Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance Company v. Lone Eagle Shipping Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 15, 1998No. 587PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

134 F.3d 103

1998 A.M.C. 964

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Corvette Cover

Underwriters-1993, Tugu Insurance Company, China Insurance

Company, Protector Forsikring AS, Oslo, Mitsui Marine and

Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. Tokyo, FAI General Insurance

Company Limited (Australia), New York Marine & General

Insurance Company, Homestead Insurance Company and Certain

Underwriters at Lloyd'S,

Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,

v.

LONE EAGLE SHIPPING LTD. (LIBERIA),

Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

The Royal Bank of Scotland, PLC, Defendant-Counterclaimant.

Nos. 445, 587,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Continental Insurance v. Lone Eagle Shipping Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. CARCO GROUP, Inc. v. MaconachyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. Detyens Shipyard, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
  3. New York Marine & General Insurance v. TradelineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  4. Clayton Services LLC v. Sun West Mortgage Company, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  5. Costanzo v. The County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API