Koondel v. Creative Capital Fund
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*588Concur-— McGivern, Nunez and Macken, JJ.; Stevens, P. J., and Capozzoli, J., dissent in the following memorandum by Capozzoli, J.: I dissent and vote to affirm the order appealed from. The instrument sued upon is a full and complete promissory note, payable on demand, and no issue is raised with regard to the execution and delivery thereof. Defendant’s claim that Benjamin Koondel, Inc., would not demand payment on the note until after the individual plaintiffs, who are the principal shareholders of Benjamin Koondel, Inc., had reinvested a sum equal to the money withdrawn from defendant in…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Mandelblatt v. Devon Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Chisholm Ryder Co. v. Munro Games, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Schulz v. BarrowsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999