Legal Opinion
United States v. Hasston, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 13, 2016No. Criminal No. 2013-0274PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Defendant’s Supplemental Motion to Transfer Venue and Denying • Defendant’s Request to Dismiss for Improper Venue
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Shantia Hassanshahi is charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1705, and the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. §§ 560.203-204, commonly referred to as the United States’ trade embargo against Iran. Mr. Hassanshahi previously filed a motion to transfer venue, for the convenience of himself and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Frank Gunnar WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Lam Kwong-Wah, United States of America v. Lam Kwong-Wah, United States of America v. Lam Kwong-WahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Johnston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Angel John ZabanehCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Frank Gunnar WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. $1,071,251.44 of Funds Associated With Mingzheng Int'l Trading Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. $1,071,251.44 of Funds Associated With Mingzheng International Trading LimitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- United States v. GuanghuaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- United States v. Oseguera GonzalezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020