Paradise Rainbow v. Fish and Game Commission
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles
This appeal involves three mandamus actions brought by re spondents and an action for mandatory injunction brought by appellant. These actions were consolidated for trial and respondents prevailed throughout.
Paradise Rainbows and Trout Unlimited, respondents, are Montana close family corporations of Warren A. DePuy, and for convenience will be referred to as “DePuy.” Appellant Fish and Game Commission of Montana will be referred to as the “Commission.”
Respondent DePuy has developed a series of commercial trout ponds lying near the Yellowstone River in Park County and initiated mandamus…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCarten v. SandersonMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Bullerdick v. HermsmeyerMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Skaggs Drug Centers v. Montana Liquor Control BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Sanders v. HillMontana Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Montana Trout Unlimited v. Beaverhead Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the WaterMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Erie v. State ex rel. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the Water Both Surface & Underground, Within the Dearborn Drainage AreaMontana Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.