Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1931No. File No. 6902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

In May, 1927, respondent Charlie Wright, then a widower, employed as housekeeper his present wife, respondent Minnie Wright, then Mrs. Schmidt, a ¡widow. Within a few months they exchanged mutual promises of marriage. When, finding herself pregnant by him, she demanded immediate fulfillment of the promise on which he had assured her she might rely in their premarital intercourse, he refused to marry. On September 29, 1927, she asked advice of appellant D. May Joyce, a practicing lawyer in Aberdeen. Appellant sent her back to Wright to ask him again to keep his promise. Wright again…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Bayou Meto Drainage District v. ChaplineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Old Dominion Transportation Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
  5. Egan v. BurnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Kerr v. KerrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Stanton v. SaksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. FIRST FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N, ETC. v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API