Stanley v. Little Pittsburg Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to District Court of Lake County. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, O. J.
The principal question presented by this record is whether, under the revenue laws of this state, *416a direct tax can be imposed upon the annual net proceeds of mines.
This question is fairly raised by the demurrer to the answer, and while the answer is defective in form, as decided by the court below, it will only be necessary to consider the above question, since it must be decisive of the case. Section 3, article X, of the constitution provides that: “All taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of subjects within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax, and shall…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Ames v. People ex rel. TempleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
- Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Parsons v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- People ex rel. Iron Silver Min. Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.