Legal Opinion

People v. Mortensen

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1935No. Crim. No. 2775PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, P. J.

Defendant having been convicted of the crime of petty theft, in connection with which it was established that theretofore she had been convicted of a felony for which she had served a term of imprisonment in this state, she appeals from the judgment which was rendered against her, as well as from the order by which her motion for a new trial was denied.

The first point presented by appellant is that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment. No useful purpose would be served by a recital of the evidence that was adduced on the trial of the action. Suffice it to say that, after a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re BoatwrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. People v. BeatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. HillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API