Legal Opinion
WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 16, 1965PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Lomenzo, Lefkowitz, and Francis X. O’Rourke, and intervening defendants Hughes and Rulison, have moved for an order declaring that the New York State Reapportionment Compliance Act, N.Y. Laws 1964, ch. 976, 977, 978, 979, 981, complies with the order of this court dated July 27, 1964. Defendants Lomenzo and Lefkowitz have also moved for an order enjoining proceedings pending in the New York State Supreme Court to test the validity of the Act under Article III of the New York State Constitution. Plaintiffs, supported by defendants Screvane, Nickerson, Maurice…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fortson v. DorseySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. BeensSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Evenwel v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Sims v. BaggettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1965
- Seaman v. FedourichNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.