Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Wright

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1900No. 3,217PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

—This was an action commenced in the court below on the 16th of January, 1896, by the appellee against the appellant. The original complaint is not in the record. It was superseded by an amended complaint filed on the 19th of September, 1898.

On the 5th of March, 1896, the appellant filed its petition verified by the affidavit of James L. Simmons, asking that one Louisa J. Martin be substituted as defendant instead of the appellant. On the 12th of March, 1896, the court, as appears from the entry made, “having seen and examined said petition of the defendant herein and the affidavit in support…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swope v. PaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Gerard v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. American Express Co. v. StackIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Merchants Despatch & Transportation Co. v. MerriamIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ontario Bank v. . N.J. Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  2. Monarch Buick Company, Inc. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Shank Fireproof Warehouse Co. v. HarlanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. W. H. McIntyre Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. In re: TIC INTERNATIONAL DATA INCIDENT LITIGATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API