St. Andrews Bay Lumber Co. v. Bernard

Ellis, J.,

concurring.—Upon considering this case, after

the writ of- error was dismissed for non-compliance with amended Buie 20 and reinstatement of it upon motion accompanied by briefs which also do not comply with the Buie, I agree to the conclusion of affirmance of the judgment reached because: first, the motion for a new trial is not included in the bill of exceptions; second, there is no exception to the Court’s1 order overruling the motion, and third, the questions submitted bear such relation to the evidence and its sufficiency to support the verdict or to justify instructions given…