Legal Opinion

Swaydan v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1916No. 7384PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Tulsa County; Con Linn, Judge. Action by Albert Swaydan against J. R. Ellis. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff 1 ¡rings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This was an action, in replevin involving the ownership of two horses. The judgment creditor of Norman Swaydan caused the horses to be seized under an order of attachment. Albert Sway-dan, the plaintiff in error, and a brother of the judgment debtor, replevined the horses, claiming to own the same, and obtained possession thereof, and was in possession off them at the time of tile trial. There was a trial to the court and a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was rendered against the plaintiff for the return of the horses, or their value, fixed at $125. Am…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. McCurry Et Ux. v. SledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Ford v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API