Legal Opinion

North Carolina Highway Commission v. Rand

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 23, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRICSON, J.

The contract between plaintiff and defendant, R. G. Rand, was to tbe effect that be was to complete project No. 940, approximately 7.13 miles, at tbe cost of approximately $80,380 of “gravel two-course,” a graded road witb a surface of two courses of crushed stone, from Waynesville, N. C., to Pigeon River in Haywood County, N. C. Rand’s outfit was put on tbe Woodrow end of tbe job. Tbe Commission to make monthly and final payments, unit prices. Other minor provisions not necessary to be considered. It was in evidence that tbe value of tbe equipment which R. Gr. Rand bad furnished on tbe job,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. OliverTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. May v. Getty.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Redding v. Vogt.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. McCurry v. . PurgasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Bacon v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Childress v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Salem Towne Apartments, Inc. v. McDaniel & Sons Roofing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970
  3. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API