Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Allegheny County Commissioners

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided January 23, 1986No. GD-85-12372PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, A.J.,

In this mandamus action, plaintiff, Judge Lawrence W. Kaplan, seeks to compel defendants1 to refrain from imposing the Allegheny County Commissioners’ compulsory retirement policy requiring all county employees, including Judge Kaplan’s tipstaff, Austin F. Lacy to retire upon reaching the age of 70. At the center of this case is a dispute between the commissioners in carrying out their legislative and executive responsibilities, and a judge’s judicial responsibilities, including the right to supervise, discharge and hire court-appointed employees.

ISSUES

The parties have stipulated…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. COM. Ex Rel. CARROLL v. TATESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Sweeney v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Ellenbogen v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Crawford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SeefriedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  2. United States v. SeefriedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API