Legal Opinion

Shields v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: We agree with the reasoning in the decision at Supreme Court *922(Doyle, J.). The court, rather than dismissing the complaint, should have declared the rights of the parties (see, Maurizzio v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 73 NY2d 951, 954; Pless v Town of Royalton, 185 AD2d 659, 660, affd 81 NY2d 1047). We modify the order appealed from, therefore, by reinstating the complaint and granting judgment declaring that the City of Buffalo was entitled to cease…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maurizzio v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tigue v. Commercial Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Kosich v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Lucas v. BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Archbishop Walsh High School v. Section VI of the New York State Public High School Athletic Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API