Legal Opinion

Carter v. Reichlin Furriers

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 10, 1977No. File No. 351Published

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint alleges that the defendant failed to return a fur coat which the plaintiff had delivered for storage during the spring and summer seasons. The trial court denied any recovery on the counts of conversion and recklessness, but rendered a judgment awarding the plaintiff $450 damages for her loss on the count alleging breach of a bailment contract. The defendant has appealed from that judgment on the ground that the storage receipt given to the plaintiff at the time the fur coat was received limited any recovery to a maximum of $100.

Several paragraphs of the draft finding were not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. Coupland v. Housatonic R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  4. Maynard v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Shulman v. Hartford Public LibrarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API