Dibbles v. State

LATTIMORE, Judge.

This appellant was convicted in the District Court of Hardin County of the offense of burglary, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

It appears from bill of exceptions No. 1 that after the testimony in the case had been introduced, the court below, with /the consent of the appellant, permitted the jury .to separate and go to their respective homes and there spend the night, none of them being accompanied by an officer. To this action of the court appellant took his bill of exceptions, which is approved by the trial court without any…