Legal Opinion

State v. Haynes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1915No. 12414PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered July 7, 1914, upon a trial and conviction of grand larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Edward Haynes and George Brenzel were jointly charged by information with the crime of larceny from the person of Frank Brooks, under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2605 (P. C. 135 § 703), defining grand larceny. They were tried jointly before the court and a jury, resulting in a verdict of not guilty as to Brenzel and a verdict of guilty as to Haynes, upon which verdict of guilty Haynes was sentenced to imprisonment. From this judgment and sentence, he has appealed.

The evidence tended to show that Haynes committed the offense as charged, by actually taking at least $24.70 from the person of Brooks; and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. JackettIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. QuilliamMontana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API