Legal Opinion
Appeal of the State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 8, 2002No. 2000-344PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The State appeals from a decision of the New Hampshire Transportation Appeals Board (board) awarding the respondent, H.E. Sargent, Inc. (Sargent), compensation for the disposal of certain surplus excavation material associated with the construction of Route 101. We reverse.
The record supports the following facts. Sargent was the successful bidder on a contract to construct a portion of Route 101 and, in April 1996, executed a contract for the work with the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (DOT). As part of the bid process, Sargent was required to provide a unit price for excavation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. CarletonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Royal Oak Realty Trust v. Mordita Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Behrens v. S.P. Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Bendetson v. Killarney, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- General Linen Services, Inc. v. Franconia Investment Associates, L.P.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Greenhalgh v. Presstek, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005