Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cummings v. Greif Bros. Cooperage Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1953No. 14615Published

1DissentThomas, Circuit Judge

The judgment appealed from reads:

“On the motion of the defendant this action is dismissed as it appears upon the face of the record, supported also by the testimony of the plaintiff, that this action is barred by the statute of limitations, and that there is want of a necessary party against whom the statute of limitations is a bar.”

In his Response to the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint D. C. Cummings, the plaintiff, alleged that he owns in his o\vn right 45 acres in Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 14 West, Pulaski County, Arkansas, and that he and his wife own the remainder…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Branch v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  2. Gannon v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Covington v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Warmack v. AskewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Cottonwood Lumber Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API