Legal Opinion

Cardiovascular Surgical Specialists, Corp. v. Mammana

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 2002No. 95738PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

¶ 1 This matter was retained by this Court for resolution of the following issues: 1) Is this appeal moot? 2) Is the decision of the arbitration panel subject to judicial review? 3) Does the “non-compete” provision in the former employee’s employment contract constitute an unlawful restraint of trade in.violation of title 15, section 217, of the Oklahoma Statutes? This Court holds that the appeal is not moot, that the decision of the arbitration panel is subject to judicial review, and that the “non-compete” provision in the employment contract constitutes an unlawful restraint of a trade or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Tatum v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Wyatt-Doyle & Butler Engineers, Inc. v. City of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Neil v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. Loewen Group Acquisition Corp. v. MatthewsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cohlmia, Jr. v. St. John Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  3. Idbeis v. Wichita Surgical Specialists, P.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. BERRY AND BERRY ACQUISITIONS v. BFN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. Howard v. Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API