Legal Opinion
Garland v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 10, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01168Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHELSEA GARLAND, et al., Case No. 24-cv-1168-BAS-SBC 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 12 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 13 MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, (ECF No. 8) et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, file a Complaint 17 against Mead Johnson & Co., LLC; Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.; and Reckitt Benckiser 18 LLC (“Defendants”) alleging violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. 19 Code § 1750 (“CLRA”); California…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.