Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goettler Distributing, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1986No. Appeal, 3229 C.D. 1983Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr:

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which holds that the claimant presented *637competent evidence of a health-based necessitous and compelling cause for her quit.

The majority concludes that the claimants testimony alone satisfies the competent evidence standard set forth in Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 475 Pa. 547, 381 A.2d 132 (1977). As support for this, it quotes a statement in Judd v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 91 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 372, 496 A.2d 1377 (1985), that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Steffy v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Judd v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Carroll v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API