Richards v. Richards's adm'r
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 83—PETITION EQUITY— APPEAL prom graves CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Civil Code, secs. 393, 14, 369, 373, 579, 580, 613. 18 B. Mon. 670, Newland v. Gentry. 3Greenleaf’s Evidence, secs. 259, 267. CITED Civil Code, secs. 14, 369-373, 579, 580. MS. Op., 1874, Easley v. Holmes. Pr. Dec.
Read the full summary
Case 83—PETITION EQUITY— APPEAL prom graves CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Civil Code, secs. 393, 14, 369, 373, 579, 580, 613. 18 B. Mon. 670, Newland v. Gentry. 3Greenleaf’s Evidence, secs. 259, 267. CITED Civil Code, secs. 14, 369-373, 579, 580. MS. Op., 1874, Easley v. Holmes. Pr. Dec. (Sneed’s Bep.) 349, Brown v. Rowland. 3 Greenleaf’s Evidence, secs. 259, 267. 1 Bibb, 271, Querry v. White. 2 Bibb, 29, Remaster v. Burckhart. 2 Bibb, 321, Cojer’s ex’r v. McGee. 2 Bibb, 173, Fleming v. Harrison. 2 Bibb, 246, Garten; &c. v. Chandler. 2 Bibb, 311, Morris v. Morris. 4 Mon. 157, Baugh v. Ramsey. 1 Marsh.…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LINDSAY
delivered the opinion oe the court.
The court in which a judgment or final order has been rendered or made has power, after the expiration of the term, to vacate or modify such judgment or final order, by granting a new trial, where there have been erroneous proceedings against an infant, married woman, or person of unsound mind, and where the condition of the defendant does not appear in the record nor the error in the proceeding. (Subsection 5, section 579, Civil Code of Practice.) In a case like this, where the infancy of the defendant does appear in the record, and the error…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. GwynnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Oliver v. ParkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Ogden v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Metzger Bros. v. Watson's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Phillips v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.