Legal Opinion

Victoria v. Le BLANC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 2000No. 97C11505; CA A103331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment that dismissed her defamation claim against defendant. The claim is based on statements that defendant made in two letters that he wrote to a local newspaper. We conclude that in those letters defendant criticized plaintiffs conduct as a public official and that federal law therefore requires plaintiff to prove a higher level of culpability than for defaming a private citizen. We also hold that the evidence on summary judgment is sufficient to create a jury question of whether plaintiff satisfied that standard. We therefore reverse.

We state the facts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Milgroom v. News Group Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Koch v. LaboricoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Medina v. Columbia River Fire & RescueDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API