Victoria v. Le BLANC
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment that dismissed her defamation claim against defendant. The claim is based on statements that defendant made in two letters that he wrote to a local newspaper. We conclude that in those letters defendant criticized plaintiffs conduct as a public official and that federal law therefore requires plaintiff to prove a higher level of culpability than for defaming a private citizen. We also hold that the evidence on summary judgment is sufficient to create a jury question of whether plaintiff satisfied that standard. We therefore reverse.
We state the facts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Milgroom v. News Group Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Koch v. LaboricoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Medina v. Columbia River Fire & RescueDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024