O'Brien v. Mayor, Aldermen Commonalty, N.Y.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 12, 1899, affirming an order of Special Term denying defendant’s motion to set aside certain judgments entered in the above-entitled actions.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 12, 1899, affirming an order of Special Term denying defendant’s motion to set aside certain judgments entered in the above-entitled actions. The question certified is as follows : “ Had the counsel to the corporation, with the" concurrence and upon the recommendation of the mayor, the comptroller and aqueduct commissioners, the chief engineer of the aqueduct commission and the special counsel retained by the city in the particular case, power to offer to confess-…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative, on the prevailing opinion below.
All concur.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bush v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- In re the Estate of SidmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Bush v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- O'Neill v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Bush v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.