State v. Hensley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
*174Where the trial court did not violate Rule 106 or otherwise abuse its discretion by admitting into evidence a detective's handwritten notes after defendant opened the door to this evidence during cross-examination, we find no error.
The State's evidence tended to show that Danny Stanley purchased a .40-caliber Glock handgun from defendant Sammy Lee Hensley Sr. in "roughly October of [20]13." The transaction occurred in a trailer belonging to defendant's mother. Defendant personally handed the gun to Stanley, and Stanley paid defendant $300.00. During the exchange, defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hensley v. HooksDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
- State v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024