Legal Opinion

State v. Hensley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 2017No. COA16-689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*174Where the trial court did not violate Rule 106 or otherwise abuse its discretion by admitting into evidence a detective's handwritten notes after defendant opened the door to this evidence during cross-examination, we find no error.

The State's evidence tended to show that Danny Stanley purchased a .40-caliber Glock handgun from defendant Sammy Lee Hensley Sr. in "roughly October of [20]13." The transaction occurred in a trailer belonging to defendant's mother. Defendant personally handed the gun to Stanley, and Stanley paid defendant $300.00. During the exchange, defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hensley v. HooksDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
  2. State v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API