Legal Opinion
Hall v. Planning Board
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 8, 1984No. (2397) (2398)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTesto, J.
In this action, the plaintiffs, landowners in the city of Stamford, are seeking a declaratory judgment and permanent injunctive relief against the defendant planning board to invalidate certain amendments made in 1981 to the city’s master plan. The plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that the defendant failed to comply with the appropriate statutory notice provisions of the Stamford charter. Because the city of Stamford has not adopted the planning and zoning provisions of the General Statutes, the notice provisions of General Statutes §§ 8-3 and 8-23 do not apply to actions of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Jarvis Acres, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- P. X. Restaurant, Inc. v. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Slagle v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daughters of St. Paul, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Koepke v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Bethlehem Christian Fellowship, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- CCH Computax, Inc. v. DubnoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Strand/BRC Group, LLC v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.