Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Tamez

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 19, 1998No. 13-95-568-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Chief Justice.

A jury found Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”), appellant, guilty of negligence and gross negligence in connection with the accidental shooting death of Raul Tamez, Jr., and assessed approximately $3.5 million in actual damages and $2 million in punitive damages. On appeal, appellant brings twelve points of error complaining of various rulings by the trial court and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Because we find that Wal-Mart did not breach any duty owed to appellees, we reverse.

Factual BackgRound

On October 10, 1993,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morin v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Robinson v. National Autotech, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  3. Taco Cabana, Inc. v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. Holcombe v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
  5. Ever Construction Corp & Jason Kang v. Sung Su, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API