Legal Opinion

State v. Glynn

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 14, 2007No. 93,413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, J.:

This direct appeal of Rico L. Glynn’s jury convictions of aggravated kidnapping, rape, and aggravated criminal sodomy raises a first impression issue in Kansas of whether deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing evidence lawfully obtained in a different case may be utilized in this or a separate case to establish necessary elements of a criminal prosecution.

We hold there is no constitutional violation or infringement of any rights of privacy when the police use a DNA profile lawfully obtained in one case to investigate and charge the DNA donor in a subsequent and different case or cases.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. AckwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. State v. JeJauncey HarringtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026
  4. Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API