State v. Glynn
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, J.:
This direct appeal of Rico L. Glynn’s jury convictions of aggravated kidnapping, rape, and aggravated criminal sodomy raises a first impression issue in Kansas of whether deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing evidence lawfully obtained in a different case may be utilized in this or a separate case to establish necessary elements of a criminal prosecution.
We hold there is no constitutional violation or infringement of any rights of privacy when the police use a DNA profile lawfully obtained in one case to investigate and charge the DNA donor in a subsequent and different case or cases.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. AckwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- State v. JeJauncey HarringtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010