Legal Opinion
At&T Wireless Services Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 9, 2001No. 00-1304PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
In the order on review, the Federal Communications Commission affirmed orders by the Bureau of Wireless Telecommunications granting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 22.925 for two years to permit AirCell, Inc. and cellular licensees that had entered into resale agreements with AirCell to provide airborne cellular telephone service. See Aircell, Inc., 15 F.C.C. Red. 9622, 2000 WL 732902 (2000). Petitioners AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., Bell South Cellular Corp., SBC Wireless, Inc., and Celico Partnership seek review of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Alianza Federal De Mercedes v. Federal Communications Commission, Hubbard Broadcasting Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Trinity Broadcasting of Florida, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. Mine Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Viasat, Inc. v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- International Dark-Sky Association, Inc. v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
- La Botz v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hensley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.