Vandiver v. Hodge
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 63 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Civil Code, sec. 161. Champerty act of 1824, 1 M. ép B., 285. 15 B. Mon., 140; Britton vs. Ruling. 15 B. Mon., 636 ; Conner vs. Ragland. 2 Met., 164; Collins vs. Merritt. 20 N. H., 369; Morrison vs. Undei'wood. MSS. Opin., Jan., 1856; Brannamann vs. Palmer. MSS. Opin., Jan., 1855; French vs. Saile. MSS. Opin., Jan., 1857 ; Morehead vs. Halsell.
Read the full summary
CASE 63 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Civil Code, sec. 161. Champerty act of 1824, 1 M. ép B., 285. 15 B. Mon., 140; Britton vs. Ruling. 15 B. Mon., 636 ; Conner vs. Ragland. 2 Met., 164; Collins vs. Merritt. 20 N. H., 369; Morrison vs. Undei'wood. MSS. Opin., Jan., 1856; Brannamann vs. Palmer. MSS. Opin., Jan., 1855; French vs. Saile. MSS. Opin., Jan., 1857 ; Morehead vs. Halsell. Act of May 31, 1865, Myers’ Supplement, 295. 2 Bush, 231; Lockhart vs. Yeiser. CITED— Revised Statutes, sec. 8, chap. 12. Act of 1798 — Champerty. 4 Dana, Í35; Ilenly vs. Gore. 3 B.…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion op the court:
On the 5th of September, 1868, the appellee, Hodge, as administrator of John W. Tibbatts, deceased, brought this suit against the appellants on three promissory notes executed by them in the year 1848 for land sold and conveyed by the intestate to them, with a reservation of a lien for securing payment. The petition showed that Hodge was qualified as administrator in August, 1852, and that the last of the notes had become due more than fifteen years before the institution of the suit, and prayed for a judgment on the notes, and an enforcement…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Warning's Ex'r v. TabelingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Yeates v. Weeden, Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
- Paintsville National Bank v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927